Tuesday, October 16, 2012

25. Plural descriptive functions * end of chapter I

 

Harold R. (Hal) Foster’s Prince Valiant
© Respective copyright/trademark holders.
Plural descriptive functions. The class of terms x which have the relation R to some member of a class a is denoted by Rʻʻa or Rєʻa. The definition is
Rʻʻa = x {(y). y є a . xRy} Df.
Thus for example let R be the relation of inhabiting, and a the class of towns; then Rʻʻa = inhabitants of towns. Let R be the relation "less than" among rationals, and a the class of those rationals which are of the form 1 - 2-n, for integral values of n; then Rʻʻa will be all rationals less than some member of a, i.e. all rationals less than 1. If P is the generating relation of a series, and a is any class of members of the series, Pʻʻa will be predecessors of a's, i.e. the segment defined by a. If P is a relation such that Pʻy always exists when y є a, P"a will be the class of all terms of the form Pʻy for values of y which are members of a; i.e.
Pʻʻa = x^{(y) . y є a . x = Pʻy}.
Thus a member of the class "fathers of great men" will be the father of y, where y is some great man. In other cases, this will not hold; for instance, let P be the relation of a number to any number of which it is a factor; then Pʻʻ (even numbers) = factors of even numbers, but this class is not composed of terms of the form "the factor of x," where x is an even number, because numbers do not have only one factor apiece.
Unit classes. The class whose only member is x might be thought to be identical with x, but Peano and Frege have shown that this is not the case. (The reasons why this is not the case will be explained in a preliminary way in Chapter II of the Introduction.) We denote by " ɿʻx "the class whose only member is x: thus
ɿʻx = y^(y=x)  Df,
i.e. " ɿʻx " means "the class of objects which are identical with x."
The class consisting of x and y will be ɿʻx ɿʻx; the class got by adding x to a class a will be a ɿʻx; the class got by taking away x from a class a will be    a- ɿʻx. (We write a - b as an abbreviation for a -b.)
It will be observed that unit classes have been defined without reference to the number 1; in fact, we use unit classes to define the number 1. This number is defined as the class of unit classes,
1 = a^ {(x). a = ɿʻx }  Df.
This leads to
:. a є 1 . ≡ : (x): y є a . ≡y . y = x.
From this it appears further that
: a є 1 . ≡ . E! (ɿʻx) (x є a),
whence : z^(φz) є 1 . ≡. E! (ɿʻx) (φx),
i.e. "z^(φz) is a unit class" is equivalent to "the x satisfying φx^ exists."
If a є 1, ɿʻa is the only member of a, for the only member of a is the only term to which a has the relation ɿ. Thus "ɿʻa" takes the place of “(ɿʻx) (φx)," if a stands for z^(φz). In practice, "ɿʻa" is a more convenient notation than “(ɿʻx) (φx)," and is generally used instead of “(ɿʻx) (φx).”
The above account has explained most of the logical notation employed in the present work. In the applications to various parts of mathematics, other definitions are introduced; but the objects defined by these later definitions belong, for the most part, rather to mathematics than to logic. The reader who has mastered the symbols explained above will find that any later formulae can be deciphered by the help of comparatively few additional definitions.
Script: Stan Lee  Pencils: & Inks: Steranko  © Respective copyright/trademark holders.
 

Throughout the previous 24 posts we have seen so many symbols, equations and definitions, but in all there was not a single number used in any notation until finally the number 1 is elaborately defined here at the end of chapter one of the introduction of Principia Mathematica. I can’t help reading a bit of tongue-in-cheek in the author’s putting this definition of 1 at the end of this chapter.
With the tools we have seen so far we have the bare bones of the process, and may be able to begin thinking of and ordering our outlines and propositional equations that are immediately more useful and quantifiable than before. In the posts ahead we shall see many of layers of fine distinction added to our present study.





Script: Stan Lee  Pencils: Jack Kirby  Inks: Frank Giacoia 
Captain America © Respective copyright/trademark holders.
 

Harold R. (Hal) Foster’s Prince Valiant
© Respective copyright/trademark holders.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment